Process Violation Is At Heart Of Rafale Controversy, Says Arun Shourie
The former minister said there’s criminal misconduct and misuse of public office in the deal to purchase 36 aircraft.
India’s purchase of 36 Rafale fighter aircraft shows “textbook ingredients” of misuse of public office amounting to “criminal misconduct”, alleged former Union Minister Arun Shourie.
In an interview with BloombergQuint, Shourie, who was a minister in the National Democratic Alliance government under Atal Bihari Vajpayee, said the Narendra Modi administration has failed to explain why a deal for 126 Rafale aircraft after years of negotiation was scrapped and replaced with another one for just 36 planes.
The issue is jeopardising the nation’s security by whittling down what was to be 126 aircraft to just 36 planes.Arun Shourie, Former Union Minister
Shourie, former Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha and activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan questioned the deal over many aspects in a statement that was released in Delhi on Aug. 8. The trio, at a press conference in the national capital, had countered the government’s claim that it had no role in Anil Ambani’s Reliance Defence & Aerospace Ltd. obtaining offset contracts from Dassault Aviation, the manufacturer of Rafale aircraft.
Reliance Defence refuted the allegations. The company said in a statement that no contract has been given to any Reliance Group company by the Ministry of Defence related to the purchase of the 36 Rafale aircraft.
The government also denied any wrongdoing, with Union Minister Arun Jaitley calling the allegations “distortion and misinformation”.
The unsubstantiated allegations against the Government constitute nothing but reprocessed lies by forces increasingly desperate to prove their relevance. The Government had already responded effectively to each and every distortion and misinformation on the issue.— Arun Jaitley (@arunjaitley) August 8, 2018
Shourie, however, said the government can’t distance itself from the benefits accrued to Reliance Defence because guidelines stipulate that no offset deal can be finalised unless it’s approved by the acquisition officer of the Defence Ministry and the Defence Minister.
Would a company with the experience of Dassault have selected a partner on its own, that has no experience, has a debt of Rs 8,000 crore, and whose accumulated loss in the first year was Rs 1,300 crore?Arun Shourie, Former Union Minister
The controversy, Shourie said, has mapped out three key contentious issues:
- Why was the deal changed allegedly at the last minute from 126 fighter planes to 36?
- Why was Reliance Defence given offset contracts without any track record of manufacture in the aviation industry?
- Why have we paid Rs 1000 crore more per aircraft than what was originally negotiated?
Defence economist Abhijit Iyer-Mitra offered a contrarian view. “Every single allegation of process violation is very selective reading,” he said. At the most, said the senior fellow at Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, there could be a case of “incompetence or poor communication from the Modi government”.
Every single allegation made for process violation is very selective reading. The problem is, in this case, prima facie there’s no case even for misconduct.Abhijit Iyer-Mitra, Senior Fellow, IPCS