Mumbai Tribunal Rules MAT Provisions Are Not Applicable To Foreign Bank Despite Having Branch In India: EY
Exclusion in law cannot be interpreted in reverse gear to automatically trigger MAT provisions if there is PE in India, ITAT says.
The Legal Library section collates quality and in-depth reports on regulatory developments, court rulings and policy changes authored by India’s top law firms and consultants. These reports offer BQ Prime’s subscribers an opportunity to expand their understanding of law and policy.
This Mumbai Tribunal ruling lays down a significant principle that minimum alternate tax provisions are not applicable to foreign companies even if they have permanent establishment in India. This is despite the fact that MAT provisions specifically exclude only those foreign companies from tax treaty countries which do not have PE in India.
This ruling supports that such a specific exclusion cannot be interpreted in reverse gear to infer that MAT provisions get automatically triggered if there is a PE in India.
For this principle, the Mumbai Tribunal relied upon the legislative intent of MAT provisions, the exclusion introduced for foreign companies and the fact that Indian PE accounts of foreign companies are not required to be placed before shareholders in an annual general meeting.
Click on the attachment to read the full report:
This alert does not constitute legal advice and is for information purpose only. This report is authored by an external party. BQ Prime does not vouch for the accuracy of its contents nor is responsible for them in any way. The views expressed in the report are that of the author entity and do not represent the views of BQ Prime.
Users have no license to copy, modify, or distribute the content without permission of the Original Owner.