JPMorgan, UBS Among Banks Facing $1 Billion FX-Rigging Suit
The lawsuit centers on collusion on foreign-exchange trading strategies, for which the European Commission fined JPMorgan.
(Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co. and UBS Group AG are among five banks being sued over allegations of foreign-exchange rigging in a class-action lawsuit seeking more than 1 billion pounds ($1.2 billion).
Barclays Plc, Citigroup Inc. and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc are the other three targets of the U.K. suit that will say pension funds, asset managers, hedge funds and corporations lost out because of market manipulation between 2007 and 2013 and should be compensated.
The lawsuit centers on collusion on foreign-exchange trading strategies, for which the European Commission fined Barclays, RBS, Citigroup, JPMorgan and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. a total of 1.07 billion euros ($1.2 billion) in May. UBS escaped a fine because it was the first to tell regulators about the collusion. Mitsubishi UFJ isn’t being sued in the civil case.
Traders ran two cartels on online chatrooms, the European regulator said. Many of them knew each other, calling one chatroom “Essex Express n’ the Jimmy” because all of the traders but one met on a commuter train from Essex to London. Other names for rooms were the “Three Way Banana Split” and “Semi Grumpy Old Men.”
It’s the latest development in a case that’s already triggered regulatory probes around the world, and billions of dollars in fines as well as $2.3 billion in settlements in the U.S. last year. JPMorgan and UBS declined to comment. The other banks didn’t immediately reply to calls or emails seeking comment.
“The message is really clear -- we want markets to work fairly,” said Michael O’Higgins, a pension fund chair who’s spearheading the U.K. suit. “People involved in markets will argue the case for free markets. They’ve got to make sure they’re fair as well as free.”
The case was filed in the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London on Monday by Scott+Scott Europe, a spokesman for the law firm said. Its U.S. arm Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP led the class action that ended with $2.3 billion in settlements.
O’Higgins, who chairs the Local Pensions Partnership, a U.K. public sector pension fund, and the Channel Islands Competition & Regulatory Authorities, said that on a conservative estimate the banks may have to pay out 1 billion pounds if he wins. The lawsuit could take three to five years, he said, and thousands of institutional investors could be in line for payouts if it succeeds.
It’s one of the first cases to be brought under 2015 U.K. legislation that paves the way for U.S.-style collective actions. The Consumer Rights Act rules mean any U.K. based investors who lost out will automatically become part of the claim. Investors based outside of the U.K. -- except those in the U.S., Canada and Australia -- can opt in.
--With assistance from Karin Matussek.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kaye Wiggins in London at email@example.com
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at firstname.lastname@example.org, Peter Chapman
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.